SQL Server 2000 running on Windows 2000
Is there a way to set up the SQL Server Log files so that it automatically creates a new one (or overwrites the old one) when the old one is full?
We keep having people shut out of our web site due to the log file being full. Since we have no DBA I volunteered to try to find out how we can avoid this faux pas in the future.
Thanks for your help!New idea for Microsoft !!!
If seriously may be it will be easier to backup transaction log more frequently (if full model) or increase maximal size of log because additional log files will only consume disk space until it is full.
It needs to find out why log is growing so fast - may be it is because of not closed transaction or something else.|||Sorry, but I'm new at this. Are we both talking about the same thing?
I'm not talking about the transaction log files that are backed up but of the log found under:
Management>SQL Server Logs
This log just shows what SQL Server has been doing, not what the users have been doing.
Perhaps you can tell me where the interface to make settings for this log can be found?|||Originally posted by Fly Girl
Sorry, but I'm new at this. Are we both talking about the same thing?
I'm not talking about the transaction log files that are backed up but of the log found under:
Management>SQL Server Logs
This log just shows what SQL Server has been doing, not what the users have been doing.
Perhaps you can tell me where the interface to make settings for this log can be found?
I am taking my words back...
Right click on SQL Server Log files/configure:
BOL:
Configure SQL Server Error Logs
Use this dialog box to view or specify the following options.
Options
Limiting the number of the error log files before they are recycled.
Check to limit the number of error logs created before they are recycled. A new error log is created each time an instance of Microsoft SQL Server is started. Typically, SQL Server retains backups of the previous six logs, unless you check this option, and specify a different maximum number of error log files below.
Maximum number of the error log files.
Specify the maximum number of error log files created before they are recycled. The default is six, which is the number of previous backup logs SQL Server retains before recycling them.|||Ok ... we need to get this clear ...
First of all .. I dont think it would be the SQL server error logs that are causing the problem.
Connect to the server ... using QA and run the following commands
exec xp_fixeddrives
and
sp_helpdb 'production_databasename'
Copy paste results and we will go further.|||Originally posted by snail
Specify the maximum number of error log files created before they are recycled. The default is six, which is the number of previous backup logs SQL Server retains before recycling them.
And you can create a scheduled to be run daily in SQL Server
Command to be executed in Job :-
dbcc errorlog|||OK, I think I've got this one ironed out now.
Thanks for the help!
Showing posts with label windows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label windows. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Friday, March 9, 2012
Dynamically change the sender email address on a SQL2005 Windows 2003 server 64-bit box using da
We currently use xp_smtp_sendmail to send the emails on a sql2000 32-bit box. We are trying to move our databases to a new sql2005 64-bit box. One solution is to replace xp_smtp_sendmail with database mail since xp_smtp_sendmail does not work on 64-bit box. The only problem is that we need to change the sender email dynamically based on the query results and I don't know how to accomplish this by using database mail. Does anyone have an idea? We are not restricted to database-mail solution though.
Thanks for help.
EXECUTE msdb.dbo.sysmail_update_account_sp
@.account_name = 'AdventureWorks Administrator',
@.email_address = 'dba@.Adventure-Works.com'
See SQL Server 2005 Books Online topic:
sysmail_update_account_sp (Transact-SQL)
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/fr-fr/library/ms188381.aspx
EXECUTE msdb.dbo.sysmail_update_account_sp
@.account_name = 'AdventureWorks Administrator',
@.email_address = 'dba@.Adventure-Works.com'
Dynamically change the sender email address on a SQL2005 Windows 2003 server 64-bit box using da
We currently use xp_smtp_sendmail to send the emails on a sql2000 32-bit box. We are trying to move our databases to a new sql2005 64-bit box. One solution is to replace xp_smtp_sendmail with database mail since xp_smtp_sendmail does not work on 64-bit box. The only problem is that we need to change the sender email dynamically based on the query results and I don't know how to accomplish this by using database mail. Does anyone have an idea? We are not restricted to database-mail solution though.
Thanks for help.
EXECUTE msdb.dbo.sysmail_update_account_sp
@.account_name = 'AdventureWorks Administrator',
@.email_address = 'dba@.Adventure-Works.com'
See SQL Server 2005 Books Online topic:
sysmail_update_account_sp (Transact-SQL)
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/fr-fr/library/ms188381.aspx
EXECUTE msdb.dbo.sysmail_update_account_sp
@.account_name = 'AdventureWorks Administrator',
@.email_address = 'dba@.Adventure-Works.com'
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Dynamic Windows Authentication
Hi
The Parent Package has a Loop Container. The Loop Container calls the Child Package and in the process the connection manager properties are changed using package configurations.
When the packages are tested in BIDS both Windows and SQL authentication work.
When the packages are scheduled on SQL authentication works and Windows authentication fails. (The account which executes the schedule has permissions to all the data sources required. The SQL Agent Service Account has permissions. In addition a crendential was created using a different account which also has permissions and this also failed.) If the connection managers are made static then the schedule executes.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks
Try this technique: http://blogs.conchango.com/jamiethomson/archive/2005/10/10/2253.aspx
-Jamie
|||The error seems to be:
An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80004005. An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "Communication link failure". An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "TCP Provider: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. ". An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.".
The dynamic windows authentication works interactively in BIDS but when scheduled it fails in the parent and child packages. An expression is used in the parent package and configurations are used in the child package. If the connections are made static the packages execute succesfully.
The KB on Troubleshooting Kerberos Delegation (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/security/tkerbdel.mspx) alludes to NTLM authentication as being the source for null user problems but why would the static package work and not the dynamic one?
Thanks
Dynamic Windows Authentication
Hi
The Parent Package has a Loop Container. The Loop Container calls the Child Package and in the process the connection manager properties are changed using package configurations.
When the packages are tested in BIDS both Windows and SQL authentication work.
When the packages are scheduled on SQL authentication works and Windows authentication fails. (The account which executes the schedule has permissions to all the data sources required. The SQL Agent Service Account has permissions. In addition a crendential was created using a different account which also has permissions and this also failed.) If the connection managers are made static then the schedule executes.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks
Try this technique: http://blogs.conchango.com/jamiethomson/archive/2005/10/10/2253.aspx
-Jamie
|||
The error seems to be:
An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80004005. An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "Communication link failure". An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "TCP Provider: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. ". An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.".
The dynamic windows authentication works interactively in BIDS but when scheduled it fails in the parent and child packages. An expression is used in the parent package and configurations are used in the child package. If the connections are made static the packages execute succesfully.
The KB on Troubleshooting Kerberos Delegation (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/security/tkerbdel.mspx) alludes to NTLM authentication as being the source for null user problems but why would the static package work and not the dynamic one?
Thanks
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Dynamic SQL Cache
I am running SQL Server 2005 SP2 Standard Edition on Windows 2003 Server
Standard Edition (4 gb RAM, No AWE Enabled, default Max/Min Memory
settings). From PerfMon traces the overall server memory appears to be just
fine all the time. The SQL Server appears to run out of available SQL
memory resources during certain ETL jobs and log the following errors:
--Error: 701, Severity: 17, State: 123
--There is insufficient system memory to run this query.
I see significant spikes in the SQLServer:Memory Manager:SQL Cache Memory
counter during times when I experience "Out Of Memory" errors on my SQL
Server. The value is normally 0 until milliseconds before I get the 701
Errors. According to BOL this Counter represents the "Total amount of
dynamic memory the server is using for the dynamic SQL cache."
What exactly is the dynamic SQL cache? What should I look for in tracking
down this memory resource hog?Hi Ulysses,
I understand that you encountered the insufficient system memory error
during your ETL jobs execution.
If I have misunderstood, please let me know.
Dynamic SQL cache means that the dynamic memory that your SQL Server
instance caches. By design SQL Server will try to occupy memory as much as
possible to ensure its performance. SQL Server frees memory when it has
more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
is a shortage of free memory. However in memory intensive usage situations,
this happens uncertainly.
You may refer to:
Dynamic Memory Management
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178145.aspx
ETL jobs for extracting large volume of data may consume large memory for
SQL Server. Since AWE was not enabled, your SQL Server can only use 2GB
memory at most. I recommend that you use /3GB switch or enable AWE option
in your SQL Server 2005.
You may refer to the following articles:
Enabling AWE Memory for SQL Server
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190673.aspx
How to configure SQL Server to use more than 2 GB of physical memory
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/en-us
Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or
concerns. Have a nice day!
Best regards,
Charles Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
===========================================================Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
===========================================================Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for
non-urgent issues where an initial response from the community
or a Microsoft Support Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable.
Please note that each follow up response may take approximately
2 business days as the support professional working with you may
need further investigation to reach the most efficient resolution.
The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by
contacting Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
============================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=========================================================|||Hi
>SQL Server frees memory when it has
> more than the min server memory setting,
BOL says
The database engine will not free any of the acquired memory until it
reaches the amount specified in min server memory
""Charles Wang [MSFT]"" <changliw@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:azN3LJrpIHA.1788@.TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl...
> Hi Ulysses,
> I understand that you encountered the insufficient system memory error
> during your ETL jobs execution.
> If I have misunderstood, please let me know.
> Dynamic SQL cache means that the dynamic memory that your SQL Server
> instance caches. By design SQL Server will try to occupy memory as much as
> possible to ensure its performance. SQL Server frees memory when it has
> more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
> is a shortage of free memory. However in memory intensive usage
> situations,
> this happens uncertainly.
> You may refer to:
> Dynamic Memory Management
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178145.aspx
> ETL jobs for extracting large volume of data may consume large memory for
> SQL Server. Since AWE was not enabled, your SQL Server can only use 2GB
> memory at most. I recommend that you use /3GB switch or enable AWE option
> in your SQL Server 2005.
> You may refer to the following articles:
> Enabling AWE Memory for SQL Server
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190673.aspx
> How to configure SQL Server to use more than 2 GB of physical memory
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/en-us
> Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or
> concerns. Have a nice day!
> Best regards,
> Charles Wang
> Microsoft Online Community Support
> ===========================================================> Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
> comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
> support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
> know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
> send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
> ===========================================================> Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
> ications.
> Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for
> non-urgent issues where an initial response from the community
> or a Microsoft Support Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable.
> Please note that each follow up response may take approximately
> 2 business days as the support professional working with you may
> need further investigation to reach the most efficient resolution.
> The offering is not appropriate for situations
> that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
> project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
> handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by
> contacting Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
> ============================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> =========================================================>
>|||Sorry for delaying this response since I took a sick leave these two days.
Hi Uri,
Could you please point out which paragraph that BOL describes this
information?
From the article "Dynamic Memory Management" in BOL, you can find the
following description:
" A SQL Server instance continues to acquire physical memory until it
either reaches its max server memory allocation target or Windows indicates
there is no longer an excess of free memory; it frees memory when it has
more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
is a shortage of free memory."
Best regards,
Charles Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
=========================================================Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
=========================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=========================================================|||Thanks. I did enable the /3GB switch and enabled AWE in SQL Server 2005 and
then set the min / max memory using sp_configure and this allowed for the
ETL process to run without interupting the other processes (i.e., no more
Out-of-Memory errors). I do not know if it was simply enabling the "AWE
/3GB" or manually setting the "min/max" memory that fixed the problem.
Perhaps it was the combination of both changes. I have moved on to more
pressing issues now (i.e., Linked Server Connection Error: 18456)|||Hi Ulysses,
Thanks for your response for letting me know this issue has been fixed.
Just clarify one thing that actually you can just enable one of the two
options:/3GB and AWE. In other words, if you specify /3GB switch, you do
not need to enable AWE; otherwise, you can enable AWE together with /PAE
switch. You may refer to:
Large memory support is available in Windows Server 2003 and in Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283037/en-us
Regarding the linked server connection error, I will continue working with
you for further research under your other post "Linked Server Connection
Error: 18459".
Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Have a nice day!
Best regards,
Charles Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
=========================================================Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
=========================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=========================================================|||Hi Charles
I hope now you are doing well.
I was mention BOL (SS2000) Min server memory option then Effects of min and
max server memory
""Charles Wang [MSFT]"" <changliw@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3FUxTgpqIHA.1784@.TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl...
> Sorry for delaying this response since I took a sick leave these two days.
> Hi Uri,
> Could you please point out which paragraph that BOL describes this
> information?
> From the article "Dynamic Memory Management" in BOL, you can find the
> following description:
> " A SQL Server instance continues to acquire physical memory until it
> either reaches its max server memory allocation target or Windows
> indicates
> there is no longer an excess of free memory; it frees memory when it has
> more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
> is a shortage of free memory."
>
> Best regards,
> Charles Wang
> Microsoft Online Community Support
> =========================================================> Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
> comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
> support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
> know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
> send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
> =========================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> =========================================================>
Standard Edition (4 gb RAM, No AWE Enabled, default Max/Min Memory
settings). From PerfMon traces the overall server memory appears to be just
fine all the time. The SQL Server appears to run out of available SQL
memory resources during certain ETL jobs and log the following errors:
--Error: 701, Severity: 17, State: 123
--There is insufficient system memory to run this query.
I see significant spikes in the SQLServer:Memory Manager:SQL Cache Memory
counter during times when I experience "Out Of Memory" errors on my SQL
Server. The value is normally 0 until milliseconds before I get the 701
Errors. According to BOL this Counter represents the "Total amount of
dynamic memory the server is using for the dynamic SQL cache."
What exactly is the dynamic SQL cache? What should I look for in tracking
down this memory resource hog?Hi Ulysses,
I understand that you encountered the insufficient system memory error
during your ETL jobs execution.
If I have misunderstood, please let me know.
Dynamic SQL cache means that the dynamic memory that your SQL Server
instance caches. By design SQL Server will try to occupy memory as much as
possible to ensure its performance. SQL Server frees memory when it has
more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
is a shortage of free memory. However in memory intensive usage situations,
this happens uncertainly.
You may refer to:
Dynamic Memory Management
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178145.aspx
ETL jobs for extracting large volume of data may consume large memory for
SQL Server. Since AWE was not enabled, your SQL Server can only use 2GB
memory at most. I recommend that you use /3GB switch or enable AWE option
in your SQL Server 2005.
You may refer to the following articles:
Enabling AWE Memory for SQL Server
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190673.aspx
How to configure SQL Server to use more than 2 GB of physical memory
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/en-us
Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or
concerns. Have a nice day!
Best regards,
Charles Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
===========================================================Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
===========================================================Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for
non-urgent issues where an initial response from the community
or a Microsoft Support Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable.
Please note that each follow up response may take approximately
2 business days as the support professional working with you may
need further investigation to reach the most efficient resolution.
The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by
contacting Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
============================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=========================================================|||Hi
>SQL Server frees memory when it has
> more than the min server memory setting,
BOL says
The database engine will not free any of the acquired memory until it
reaches the amount specified in min server memory
""Charles Wang [MSFT]"" <changliw@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:azN3LJrpIHA.1788@.TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl...
> Hi Ulysses,
> I understand that you encountered the insufficient system memory error
> during your ETL jobs execution.
> If I have misunderstood, please let me know.
> Dynamic SQL cache means that the dynamic memory that your SQL Server
> instance caches. By design SQL Server will try to occupy memory as much as
> possible to ensure its performance. SQL Server frees memory when it has
> more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
> is a shortage of free memory. However in memory intensive usage
> situations,
> this happens uncertainly.
> You may refer to:
> Dynamic Memory Management
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178145.aspx
> ETL jobs for extracting large volume of data may consume large memory for
> SQL Server. Since AWE was not enabled, your SQL Server can only use 2GB
> memory at most. I recommend that you use /3GB switch or enable AWE option
> in your SQL Server 2005.
> You may refer to the following articles:
> Enabling AWE Memory for SQL Server
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190673.aspx
> How to configure SQL Server to use more than 2 GB of physical memory
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/en-us
> Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or
> concerns. Have a nice day!
> Best regards,
> Charles Wang
> Microsoft Online Community Support
> ===========================================================> Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
> comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
> support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
> know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
> send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
> ===========================================================> Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
> ications.
> Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for
> non-urgent issues where an initial response from the community
> or a Microsoft Support Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable.
> Please note that each follow up response may take approximately
> 2 business days as the support professional working with you may
> need further investigation to reach the most efficient resolution.
> The offering is not appropriate for situations
> that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
> project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
> handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by
> contacting Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
> ============================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> =========================================================>
>|||Sorry for delaying this response since I took a sick leave these two days.
Hi Uri,
Could you please point out which paragraph that BOL describes this
information?
From the article "Dynamic Memory Management" in BOL, you can find the
following description:
" A SQL Server instance continues to acquire physical memory until it
either reaches its max server memory allocation target or Windows indicates
there is no longer an excess of free memory; it frees memory when it has
more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
is a shortage of free memory."
Best regards,
Charles Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
=========================================================Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
=========================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=========================================================|||Thanks. I did enable the /3GB switch and enabled AWE in SQL Server 2005 and
then set the min / max memory using sp_configure and this allowed for the
ETL process to run without interupting the other processes (i.e., no more
Out-of-Memory errors). I do not know if it was simply enabling the "AWE
/3GB" or manually setting the "min/max" memory that fixed the problem.
Perhaps it was the combination of both changes. I have moved on to more
pressing issues now (i.e., Linked Server Connection Error: 18456)|||Hi Ulysses,
Thanks for your response for letting me know this issue has been fixed.
Just clarify one thing that actually you can just enable one of the two
options:/3GB and AWE. In other words, if you specify /3GB switch, you do
not need to enable AWE; otherwise, you can enable AWE together with /PAE
switch. You may refer to:
Large memory support is available in Windows Server 2003 and in Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283037/en-us
Regarding the linked server connection error, I will continue working with
you for further research under your other post "Linked Server Connection
Error: 18459".
Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Have a nice day!
Best regards,
Charles Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
=========================================================Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
=========================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=========================================================|||Hi Charles
I hope now you are doing well.
I was mention BOL (SS2000) Min server memory option then Effects of min and
max server memory
""Charles Wang [MSFT]"" <changliw@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3FUxTgpqIHA.1784@.TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl...
> Sorry for delaying this response since I took a sick leave these two days.
> Hi Uri,
> Could you please point out which paragraph that BOL describes this
> information?
> From the article "Dynamic Memory Management" in BOL, you can find the
> following description:
> " A SQL Server instance continues to acquire physical memory until it
> either reaches its max server memory allocation target or Windows
> indicates
> there is no longer an excess of free memory; it frees memory when it has
> more than the min server memory setting, and Windows indicates that there
> is a shortage of free memory."
>
> Best regards,
> Charles Wang
> Microsoft Online Community Support
> =========================================================> Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
> comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
> support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
> know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
> send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@.microsoft.com.
> =========================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> =========================================================>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)